countdown to super duper tuesday...
This is my dream battle for the 2008 race to the White House: Hillary Clinton v. John McCain.
And the NYT just called it. (!)
Read the endorsements here and here.
Even though, as the NYT writes, "firstness" doesn't matter, I take pride in the fact that, for the first time (and presumably not the last), they also write, "She is the best choice for the Democratic Party as it tries to regain the White House."
And it is also somewhat hilarious - though not unexpected - that the NYT started the McCain endorsement like this: "We have strong disagreements with all the Republicans running for president. The leading candidates have no plan for getting American troops out of Iraq. They are too wedded to discredited economic theories and unwilling even now to break with the legacy of President Bush. We disagree with them strongly on what makes a good Supreme Court justice. Still, there is a choice to be made, and it is an easy one."

2 Comments:
Vote 1 Obama. Clinton is part of the old guard. Obama is the new hope.
Right on! Obama is the future. Yes, the Clinton years were great, but those days are gone forever. It's time for a new direction. Yes, I want to see more women in politics, but Hillary has too much baggage to take on the Rethuglicans. My vote is going for the Obama because he does not take any money from lobbyists or PACs.
Post a Comment
<< Home